Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, make sure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is set in its place.

However, decisions rendered by the Supreme Court from the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues of the Constitution and federal regulation.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. From the meantime police shall remain neutral while in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any with the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall choose prompt action against them under regulation. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to carry out away with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more

ten. Without touching the merits with the case in the issue of yearly increases while in the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these kinds get more info of yearly increase, if permissible inside the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment to get made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided via the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to become gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

Because of their position between The 2 main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of legislation.

States also commonly have courts that tackle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family legislation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common legislation, would be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case legislation may very well be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) just isn't strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in The big apple will not be binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning could possibly help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *